The greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it.”
— Eliezer Yudkowsky
A federal judge in San Francisco has granted Anthropic a preliminary injunction in its lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense, blocking a Trump administration directive that every federal agency would ban the use of Anthropic AI system, Claude.
OpenAI has wound down its Sora short-video app amid criticism over low-quality “AI slop” content flooding the platform. At the same time, a high-profile $1 billion partnership with Walt Disney has reportedly fallen through before completion.
Recent reports on AI affecting global workforce paints a problematic picture-the people most exposed to AI today are older professionals, highly educated, better paid — and more likely to be women.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a dispute over whether AI-generated material can qualify for copyright protection, leaving lower court rulings in place. Those rulings emphasize that human authorship is a fundamental requirement under the Copyright Act.
U.S. teens are turning to generative AI for homework help, creative tasks, and casual conversation — raising serious questions not just about academic integrity, but about a growing dependence on machines to do their thinking for them.
Anthropic, the creator of Claude AI, has accused Chinese AI companies Deepseek, Moonshot and MiniMax of illicit distillation of Claude to train their own AI models.
India has become OpenAI’s second-largest market, surpassing 100 million weekly ChatGPT users. The rapid growth highlights extraordinary adoption, even as questions intensify around ownership, jobs, and who stands to benefit most from the AI boom.
Global AI giants aren’t giving India free access out of generosity. They are training habits and harvesting data in the world’s most price‑sensitive, data‑rich market.
Seedance 2.0, an AI model released by Bytedance has caught the world’s attention with its hyper realistic models.
AI is a system built by humans and their choices, limited by human data. It is exceptionally good at certain tasks while equally fallible at others. And it is no where near to human intelligence let alone “superintelligence”. Here’s an article debunking five common myths about artificial intelligence.
