The greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it.”
— Eliezer Yudkowsky
The Singapore High Court observed the alarming trend of lawyers using generative AI to completely outsource their work.
The U.S. says it is promoting secure AI exports, not reviving the Biden-era AI Diffusion Rule. But as new controls on advanced AI chips emerge, the debate is shifting toward a larger question: who will control the computing power shaping the future of artificial intelligence?
The ongoing conflict in the middle east could pose a serious road block to the semi-conductor industry.
A recent report prepared by Anthropic shows the actual threat of AI displacing jobs is far higher than the current scenario.
The latest lawsuit against Google is one among filed by families of victims who claimed the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot encouraged harmful thoughts of users.
Skilled Humans versus AI Agents? RevenueCat, a SaaS company just said the “quiet part loud” with their job posting for AI agents.
A New York Senate Bill bans Artificial Intelligence from masquerading as licensed professionals and prohibits them from giving any professional advice.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a dispute over whether AI-generated material can qualify for copyright protection, leaving lower court rulings in place. Those rulings emphasize that human authorship is a fundamental requirement under the Copyright Act.
Singapore, one of the most AI exposed workforces in the world, has ambitious plans to turn its 100,000 workers AI bilingual by 2029.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called his company’s deal with the U.S. Department of War (DOW) sloppy and opportunistic after the public fallout of Anthropic and DOW.
