Journalism begins where hype ends

,,

I visualise a time when we will be to robots what dogs are to humans, and I’m rooting for the machines."

—Claude Shannon

Japan Calls on AI Companies to Disclose Training Data for Transparency

The proposed code aims to strengthen transparency around AI training data and protect intellectual property rights.
Illustration of a magnifying glass labeled “Intellectual Property” over an AI-themed digital background.
August 21, 2026 09:27 PM IST | Written by Supriya Singh | Edited by Pratima O Pareek

Artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights collide as Japan steps up pressure on generative AI firms to reveal what powers their models.

The Japanese government has approved a draft “principle code” calling on generative AI companies to disclose information about their training data and the methods used to collect it, as Japan seeks to strengthen intellectual property protection while supporting technological innovation.

The draft code was presented at an online meeting of an expert panel studying intellectual property rights in the AI era. It builds on an AI-related law enacted in May 2025.

The proposed framework would use a nonbinding “comply or explain” approach, under which businesses could follow the code or publicly explain why they choose not to. The framework would also cover foreign businesses providing AI services in Japan.

The principle code is centered on three pillars regarding training data: disclosure of an outline, disclosure to rights holders and disclosure to AI users. Under the first, AI businesses would disclose information about the models they use, their training data and the methods used to collect it.

The second covers requests from copyright and other rights holders about whether specific webpages were included in training data. The third covers information requests from users concerned about potential copyright infringement.

The draft has also drawn attention to the need for continued review of its effectiveness and the treatment of sensitive information, including trade secrets.

The government plans to finalize the principles and begin implementing them as early as this autumn.

Also Read: NYT Publisher: ‘Tech Giants Strip-Mine Original Journalism, Repackage Stolen Goods as Their Own’

Authors

  • AI FrontPage Reporter Supriya Singh

    Supriya Singh is a Reporter at AI FrontPage covering the AI & Education and AI & Jobs beats. She brings six years of print and digital experience, including three years at The Asian Age, where she reported on higher education, Delhi government, and crime. She is based in Delhi-NCR.

    LinkedIn

  • Pratima Pareek, Editor and Co-founder of AI FrontPage

    Pratima O Pareek is an Editor and Co-Founder of AI FrontPage. A gold medalist in Mass Communication and Journalism, she's worked across national and international newsrooms, bringing sharp editorial instincts and a commitment to clarity. She believes in cutting through the noise to deliver stories that actually matter.
    Off the clock, she watches offbeat cinema, follows tennis, and explores new places like a traveler, not a tourist.

    LinkedIn